The legal effort has continued unabated on the case of a Texas schoolteacher presenting non-consensually implanted nanotechnology.
The Case stalled at the trial court. A finding was made that an object is an injury – this finding was not strongly supported, yet was used to rule the Plaintiff had already spent their fair opportunity to pursue the case; despite the Plaintiff not knowing about the specific object during any prior litigation.
A better position was that one must know about the objected before one could sue. Therefore, the Plaintiff argued that she could still sue within 2 years of learning of the object’s existence.
The matter thus turns on fair access to the courts, well embodied in the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, our Guarantee to due process : a claim should not be excluded before one learns the existence of the object being sued upon.
The Trial Court’s ruling was thus appealed. The Legal Coop supported the pro se Plaintiff’s advance through Texas Appeals Courts. There, Texas Appeals Court affirmed the Trial Court.
That initial Appellate ruling was then appealed to the Texas Supreme Court, which in turn, declined to hear the case.
The fight did not end there.
More effort and resources were poured into the case; including legal help from outside The Legal Coop. An outside lawyer was presented with exigent scheduling, nonetheless managed to help Plaintiff file a Petition for writ of certiorari, this past June, 2023.
The dispute can now be heard by the United States Supreme Court.
The Legal Coop continues supporting the Plaintiff and others in their quest to find justice for serious if novel methods of unethical human experimentation.
More of our work on this cutting edge issue is found here. Find other general materials in our growing Free Litigation Library, here.
The Appeals decision, the Motion to rehear in the Texas Supreme Court, and the Petition for writ of certiorari: All three documents are enclosed below. Cheers.
Sample Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court : Non-Consensual Injectable Implant / Biochip / Microchip Case #RNM #Injectable Implants #Privacy #Harassment #Nanotechnology #Biochips #Microchips
Lawsuits of this type are rare – but more and more lawyers are learning how to draft a proper complaint and achieve substantial justice for their clients and communities.
We are making the Complaint available for download right here. Cheers:
Can you Help us carry forward on this work ? It’s easy to do a one-time gift, or arecurrent contribution, here. You can help us protect these rights and keep the work coming. Thank You.
Not legal advice. Use only with legal counsel and with adaptation to your facts and local law.
Read : Suing the Government for Targeting and Harassment / Suing for Justice : a Civil Complaint for the Pasco County Targeting Program
The Criminal charges in theeBay cross-border stalking case was just the beginning. The perps had brazenly claimed there had been no crimes committed. Well they were really, really wrong about that. And they probably didn’t anticipate the next blow: A gigantic Civil lawsuit. Not just against the people that are criminally charged, but also against the two executives that were allegedly involved in directing the stalking.
Please note that Criminal cases have a more demanding burden of proof than civil cases – meaning Prosecutors must prove their case “beyond a reasonable doubt” (very roughly, 95% proven), while civil cases have a “preponderance of the evidence standard” (very roughly, 51% proven).
You want to know more about the Civil Lawsuit ? Get this Tweeted a total of thirty times and I’ll write that portion of the story. You are going to love that part!
Read “Corporate Targeting Exposed: Group Harassment and Gangstalking Busted, Civil Lawsuit Filed’ #Gangstalking #harassment
How can you prove a Civil case for harassment by a group ? Similar to a criminal case, but you and/or your lawyer have to do the presentation and prosecution of the case : Start with a thorough investigation. Assembling your evidence. Then, a convincing presentation to the factfinder: The Jury. Wouldn’t you love for the perpetrators to have to explain themselves in court ?
Like a criminal affidavit, the writer of a Civil Complaint must be careful to include only things that are personally known, and to take the time to explain how they are known. Effective cases are about personal knowledge and well grounded belief. These things can be proven. Meanwhile matters of opinion and conjecture are avoided altogether – unless you have an expert that will testify. There is some explanation of the differences between personal knowledge, opinion and belief, in this post, and some practical pointers in this resource.
The Complaint also illustrates the type of pattern evidence that is useful in harassment cases, and how it is documented.
We are making the Complaint available for download right here:
According to the pleadings, it all started with some high-flying Ebay executives, irked about some non-flattering blog posts.
Those executives happened to include eBay’s CEO, eBay’s Senior Vice President, and eBay’s head of security.
The irksome posts were from an older couple in the East coast. They dared criticize some of eBay’s policies and decisions.
In the beautifully attired eBay’s headquartes, decisions were being made that would change lives. The executives summoned the Senior Director of Safety & Security.
Together, they made the couple a “target.”
Their ostensible goal was
“neutralizing [Victim 1’s] website”
That gentle euphemysm, “neutralizing” is frequently misued by a certain clique. Here, they eventually explained what they wanted to see:
“Ashes”
Out went eBay corporate “security,” into action. (eBay like many Fortune 500 corporations has “intelligence” departments.)
They even have a Special Operations department- also charged with executive “security.” It was People from those departments, and what appeared to be contractors from an independent private “intelligence” company that were summoned. At least 4 of them had police and or military experience. This included two retired police captains. It also included someone with professed CIA experience. The team began communicating in earnest
“you and I need to fly to east coast for op. I’ll book travel arrangements off the grid.”
“copy.”
Pause for a second : the setting is private companies, but the subject matter is repression, the background is publishing, and the language is military : doesn’t this remind you of something known as “Cointelpro” ?
Back to what followed. Three weeks of hell were about to unfold.
The perps moved fast. They flew in, and attempted to break-in to install a GPS tracker on the bloggers’ vehicle – to get location and movements 24/7. They did not succeed with the GPS. Instead, they used vehicles which began circling the neighborhood, and menacingly following the couple when they left their residence.
The perps had already spray-painted graffiti onto the couple’s property; now they mailed a funeral wreath, and a book on overcoming the grief from a spouse’s death. Live cockroaches, live spiders came in the mail. Hustler’s ‘barely legal’ porn – mailed to their neighbors – in the couple’s name. At least 53 questionable subscriptions and publications were subscribed to, in the couples name, including cadaver lists. This created all manner of compromising ‘connections’ to the couple. A bloody mask from the Saw movies arrived, and in that movie, that was the last thing people ‘saw’ before being abducted, tortured, and murdered.
The effects were immediate. The couple began losing sleep from the constant harassment. At 4:30 one morning, for example, a person showed up at their doorstep – a 24 hour eatery, delivering food they had not ordered.
The perps unleashed a barrage of hideous emails and social media posts:
Fake accounts threatened to and and actually published the Couple’s home address on Twitter.
The perps would communicate their desire : stop the reporting on eBay, but then they pretended to be volatile eBay sellers concerned about their profits – not connected to eBay itself.
Fake craiglist ads popped up, soliciting sexual activity at the couple’s home for all night swinger’s parties. Or more subtle requests for bdsm, and publishing their home address. Here is just one example:
Meanwhile, co-conspirators kept an eye on local police – At one point, their look-outs called the perps off, just as police were being dispatched.
The perps gloated,
“…We know the targets have been impacted by this op.”
The perps made a more complex move: They falsely accused the couple of threatening eBay executives. This got written up in a fake corporate report. This would make the couple into POIs – Persons of Interest – potentially dangerous people that have to be watched. Police and associated safety organizations will normally watch POIs, sometimes intrusively.
NIMBY types will flock to watch POIs thinking they are saving their children from some potential threat. The perps were going to use the fake POI report to justify their corporate security department’s presence around the couple. They are ensuring safety, after all. The couple’s dossier was also built to make the couple look crazy. The perps were going to share that with the local PD. Everywhere they went, someone would be watching them.
The disturbing thing about the POI rstrategy is that the victimizer was falsely accusing the victims of being the aggressors. How’s that for security.
This, and more, all happening within just three weeks. The couple was absolutely terrorized. They froze their accounts, fearing identify theft and bank fraud. They slept in separate bedrooms – in case the stalkers decided to make good on their un-subtle death threats.
But, they also made a choice. Instead of running, or going silent, they decided to catch these guys. They got security cameras for their home, and dash cameras for ther car, and they started watching. The couple also decided to take pictures of the vehicles following them.
Finally, their efforts began showing results. Vehicles were recorded, circling the neighborhood and even stopping in front of the couple’s residence, for no reason. People were caught on camera, needlessly approaching the couple’s residence.
Then, a breakthrough: The couple got a picture of one of the vehicles that had been following them, including the license plate. The local police was informed, and looked into it. Unfortunately, the car was a rental. But… the plates traced the rental back, to a person, and the person had a LinkedIn profile: Bingo, an eBay employee. These journalists were critical of Ebay so maybe not a Coincidence. A local police investigation began.
The perps had been comfortably staying at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Boston, about 20 miles away from where the couple lived. Then this happened:
Things were getting tight. The perps knew they had been photographed in the car, so they had returned the rental. But they returned the rental at the Ritz Carlton, which led a detective to the hotel. And one of their hotel rooms was booked by the same employee who rented the car. There was some scurrying while perps decided how to be smart.
Then, as the police inquiries began, the perps’s scurrying had included trying to talk their way out of it. They tried to cover their tracks with each other, make up stories, delete their messages, and clean out their computers. Ebay’s security chief called the local police and got the local police to tell him all the information they had.
“Initially the PD was disregarding the reports as Paranoia. But when they gave the an accurate license plate number the detectives tracked it back…”
There it was, the single snapshot, a simple picture that brought them down.
The security chief was then hard-pressed into a two-track strategy:
“We just need to explain away [Perp’s] activities. Adamantly deny any deliveries and put focus on the POIs.”
One track was to give the fake POI report to the police. The couple was listed there as eBay’s top two POIs. This would destroy the victims’ credibility and justify the perps presence: the perps were the good guys, investigating a potential threat – it was the POIs who had caused it all.
Security could take one of the fake twitter accounts and create a fake paper trail: that person would suddenly become real, and be in the couple’s neighborhood: he must be the one terrorizing the couple. Those crazy POIs you know…. Another version of this plan was to simply search for a real POI, and then frame them for what was happening. The POIs, whether fake or real would also happen to be from Santa Clara: The town where someone had bought gift cards that were used to purchase some of items sent to the couple.
The Santa Clara gift cards were a thorn in the perp’s side. There was also store video of the same person who rented the car buying the gift cards, not far from eBay’s HQ in Santa Clara – that would link it all back to eBay. The perps decided to pull strings on someone in Santa Clara law enforcement: someone to mislead the local PD if they searched for the video.
These guys could do that, they could pull ‘rank’ on local police. After all, these perps were very high level security personnel, had clearances, held high rank in notable police departments. Positions the local cops might aspire to hold. The big lie tied things together, and the perps were the good guys “investigating” the whole thing. Any prior contact with the couple would be explained to the police as a “welfare check” on the couple – a loosely regulated and easily abused type of inquiry, one that could be blamed on the victims, and faked as part of the investigation.
The other track was a “white Knight” strategy – directed towards the couple. A perp was to approach the couple, again, out of concern. He had seen some threats, and being eBay’s security, he wanted to help. He would offer to work with the couple, in resolving the obvious threat posed by the perps. That strategy ran smack into the perceptive wife of the couple : she bought none of it, and harshly directed him to the local police.
Things weren’t going well. eBay’s security chief wrote his executive, apparently the CEO or senior VP, and asked for someone to run interference.
As of this time, there is no record of any reply.
Then, it lit. Federal Arrest warrants, Federal Charges.
The perps earned 18 USC 2261A charges due crossing state lines in their stalking/harassment – including renting vehicles, following them, spray painting their home, and the attempted break-ins. They got other federal charges, due to the cyberstalking: using the internet for their plan. All that took it into Federal jurisdiction.
The seemingly clever lying, conniving, and destruction of evidence earned them separate offences:
Witness tampering, destruction of evidence / obstructing a Federal investigation.
There was a multi-count indictment waiting for eBay’s Senior Director of Safety & Security – their head security guy. A five year sentence, three years of supervised release. A fine of up to $250,000.00 and mandatory restitution. For Each Charge.
In the same post with the Affidavit we have placed the criminal Judgment/Sentence that recently issued, so you can see how the couple’s stand made a difference. The criminal judgment shown is for a minor co-conspirator who pled guilty and received 18 months in Federal prison. Due to pleading guilty he got conspiracy to commit cyberstalking, and conspiracy to tamper with a witness. Three years of supervised release, and a $15,000.00 fine. All because of a courageous couple, and a timely snapped picture. That perp will not be running any stalking ops any time soon, will they ?
Maybe the guys at the top didn’t have anything on the couple. Maybe the easy money wasn’t worth it. Maybe those people they tortured were innocent.
Maybe the POIs don’t deserve what they are getting – harassment is punishment without a trial – it’s illegal. One indicator of how serious this corporate intelligence abuse of power is, came from the security chief’s own messages, intercepted during the investigation.
It turns out the security was annoyed by a small town DA, in his home town, who was prosecuting his father. The security chief asked for a report on the DA, including his kids names. He arrogantly gloated,
“This is a very small town. If I gave him an ounce of what we’ve been giving the [Victims], it would be devastating to him.”
Maybe it’s not right for private “intelligence” to be destroying small town DAs with such ease. And now, they’ll have a lot of time in federal pen to think about it.
In the end, the couple could have just stopped covering eBay, or moved. But they did not. Their courage, your courage, makes all the difference.
The people in this report are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Read “Corporate Targeting Exposed: Explore the Federal Criminal Charges Against eBay Executives for Gangstalking and Harassment” An Attorney’s Perspective on how to set back Harassment and Stalking #Gangstalking #harassment
Stalking by multiple perpetrators, accross state boundaries, resulting in fear. That’s it, the basic elements of a 2261A federal criminal court case.
How can you prove it ? That’s a Prosecutor’s job. But first, you have to give them what they need. Thorough investigation. Assembling your evidence. Then, a convincing presentation to the factfinder: The police.
In this criminal case seeking a warrant, this all started with an affidavit to the judge.
This Affidavit was used in Court to get criminal charges for the famous Ebay Gangstaking case. That case had a couple who ran a news blog one side; and several Ebay senior executives wielding their “security” department.
What is most important to note is how careful the writer is to include only things that are personally known, and often taking the time to explain how they are known. Effective criminal affidavits are about personal knowledge and well grounded belief. These things can be proven. Meanwhile matters of opinion and conjecture are avoided altogether – unless you have an expert that will testify. There is some explanation of the differences between personal knowledge, opinion and belief, in this post, and some practical pointers in this resource.
The Affidavit also illustrates the type of pattern evidence that is necessary for these stalking cases, and how it is documented. Though usually no physical injuries are required, stalking does generally require the infliction of fear. Here you will see a confluence of facts that would lead to fear:
An angry eBay Seller threatens to destroy a person; the eBay seller publishes that person’s home address online; the eBay seller sends a funeral wreath and a book on death; the eBay seller tweets about an imminent”visit” by the angry eBay sellers to the persons home; graffiti is left on the person’s home; and the person notices they are being followed around their home town. Any one of these facts by themselves does not paint a full picture of what transpired, and it requires substantial effort to document and present the full story.
We are making the Affidavit available for downloaded below:
Perpetrators of High-Tech Harassment and Revenge often look for secrecy. Their goal is a takedown or getting even, all without a trace.
One of the tools used in such harassment is V2K devices. Unfortunately, most people are simply uniformed about this technology:
V2K technology is not new. As shown in the attached support letter it was acknowledged in the leading Psychology Journal, as early as 1975. It was also acknowledged as a weapon, and listed in the U.S. Army Web Site. Most recently, it has seen commercial use, including use as a marketing tool – aimed at pedestrians on a New York sidewalk, to draw their attention to a movie billboard overhead.
Problems arise when a survivor of such a technology mentions them to authorities or family. They may automatically assume auditory hallucination and related mental ailments – pressing for involuntary commitments, or other unnecessary services.
What we have done here, for example, is to communicate with survivors and people in authority. We inform them of the technology and how it is used. This tends to defuse the situation and informs the parties of the possibilities. It is also good to show the person has backup. In the end, it is critical to point out how some of these situations are not indicative of mental illness, but may be related to harassment instead.
This guide is used to prepare your evidence and prove your case. Evidence rules prevent unfair convictions and judgments, but they require some leg work. You can use this to help prove your case, or to help show the other side has failed to prove theirs !
The guide was prepared by Texas Young Lawyers Association. We have no affiliation with TYLA, but we can say this work of theirs helps young lawyers lead worthwhile careers, and aids the public as well.
Guides of this type are an invaluable tool for litigation. We used tools like this to help prepare a case in a recent gangstalking matter described in its First part here, the Second part here, and the Third part here.
We are making the Guide available for downloaded below:
This Criminal Protective Order was issued by a California Superior Court, protecting a survivor of long term Stalking and Harassment: A svelte 60 year old female retiree, repeatedly harassed by a 300lb man.
The Document Orders the Respondent to
“not harass, strike, threaten, assault (sexually or otherwise), follow, stalk, molest, destroy or damage personal or real property, disturb the peace. keep under surveillance, or block movements of the protected persons named above.”
The Order goes on to limit firearms, a useful thing considering this Defendant has threatened to shoot people for serving him legal documents in the case. On that subject the Defendant is ordered to
“not own, possess, buy or try to buy, receive or try to receive, or otherwise obtain a firearm or ammunition. The defendant must surrender to local law enforcement, or sell to or store with a licensed gun dealer any firearm owned by the defendant or subject to his or her immediate possession or control within 24 hours”
To understand the sequence that precedes the Order, this CPO issued due criminal charges. The Criminal charges came from violations of a Civil Restraining Order we helped the Client obtain, and which is discussed here.
We are making the Order available for downloaded below:
The Court of Appeals has reviewed jurisdictional briefing and has now found probable jurisdiction for an appeal in a Texas Non-consensual implants case.
This case involves non-consensual Implantations allegedly occurring during a scar removal proceedure. During the otherwise simple procedure, one of the medical personnel proposed an injection in the forehead. The site of the injection became discolored, and infected. Subsequently, a surgeon was able to remove a foreign body from the site of injection, and sent it to a lab. The lab analysis confirmed an implant. There is a lively discussion of the case and background in this video.
The case had prior been dismissed, with the dismissal appearing centered on a statutory interpretation. That interpretation requires a detailed expert report of specific wrongdoing to be filed, even at a time when the specific wrongdoing is unknown to have occurred.
We believe knowledge of specific wrongdoing is a pre-requisite to any detailed reporting. Otherwise, one would expect such a premature report to be quite uninformative, namely blank. Subtle torts like poisonings might include a fast acting poision and a slow acting poison : If such reporting is required, the second and more subtle tort would escape justice. Likewise for foreign body cases, where a leftover foreign body like surgical sponges remain undiscovered for years after the original procedure. A Plaintiff should not be charged with knowing, suing upon, and filing expert reporting upon as of yet unknown torts.
This is particularly true in cases of non-consensual implants or foreign body cases, where the items left behind are minute in nature. We are prepared to assist the Plaintiff in presenting this view.
Accordingly, the ruling is the subject of an appeal to a higher court at this time:
Be advised that this case is currently in litigation, so the above are allegations and the Court and jury will decide.
Just how did you notice our tip jar ?!? Please accept our heartfelft thanks for helping get progress on these issues.
The Legal Coop 