Lawsuits of this type are rare – but more and more lawyers are learning how to draft a proper complaint and achieve substantial justice for their clients and communities.
We are making the Complaint available for download right here. Cheers:
Can you Help us carry forward on this work ? It’s easy to do a one-time gift, or arecurrent contribution, here. You can help us protect these rights and keep the work coming. Thank You.
Not legal advice. Use only with legal counsel and with adaptation to your facts and local law.
Read : Suing the Government for Targeting and Harassment / Suing for Justice : a Civil Complaint for the Pasco County Targeting Program
The Criminal charges in theeBay cross-border stalking case was just the beginning. The perps had brazenly claimed there had been no crimes committed. Well they were really, really wrong about that. And they probably didn’t anticipate the next blow: A gigantic Civil lawsuit. Not just against the people that are criminally charged, but also against the two executives that were allegedly involved in directing the stalking.
Please note that Criminal cases have a more demanding burden of proof than civil cases – meaning Prosecutors must prove their case “beyond a reasonable doubt” (very roughly, 95% proven), while civil cases have a “preponderance of the evidence standard” (very roughly, 51% proven).
You want to know more about the Civil Lawsuit ? Get this Tweeted a total of thirty times and I’ll write that portion of the story. You are going to love that part!
Read “Corporate Targeting Exposed: Group Harassment and Gangstalking Busted, Civil Lawsuit Filed’ #Gangstalking #harassment
How can you prove a Civil case for harassment by a group ? Similar to a criminal case, but you and/or your lawyer have to do the presentation and prosecution of the case : Start with a thorough investigation. Assembling your evidence. Then, a convincing presentation to the factfinder: The Jury. Wouldn’t you love for the perpetrators to have to explain themselves in court ?
Like a criminal affidavit, the writer of a Civil Complaint must be careful to include only things that are personally known, and to take the time to explain how they are known. Effective cases are about personal knowledge and well grounded belief. These things can be proven. Meanwhile matters of opinion and conjecture are avoided altogether – unless you have an expert that will testify. There is some explanation of the differences between personal knowledge, opinion and belief, in this post, and some practical pointers in this resource.
The Complaint also illustrates the type of pattern evidence that is useful in harassment cases, and how it is documented.
We are making the Complaint available for download right here:
According to the pleadings, it all started with some high-flying Ebay executives, irked about some non-flattering blog posts.
Those executives happened to include eBay’s CEO, eBay’s Senior Vice President, and eBay’s head of security.
The irksome posts were from an older couple in the East coast. They dared criticize some of eBay’s policies and decisions.
In the beautifully attired eBay’s headquartes, decisions were being made that would change lives. The executives summoned the Senior Director of Safety & Security.
Together, they made the couple a “target.”
Their ostensible goal was
“neutralizing [Victim 1’s] website”
That gentle euphemysm, “neutralizing” is frequently misued by a certain clique. Here, they eventually explained what they wanted to see:
“Ashes”
Out went eBay corporate “security,” into action. (eBay like many Fortune 500 corporations has “intelligence” departments.)
They even have a Special Operations department- also charged with executive “security.” It was People from those departments, and what appeared to be contractors from an independent private “intelligence” company that were summoned. At least 4 of them had police and or military experience. This included two retired police captains. It also included someone with professed CIA experience. The team began communicating in earnest
“you and I need to fly to east coast for op. I’ll book travel arrangements off the grid.”
“copy.”
Pause for a second : the setting is private companies, but the subject matter is repression, the background is publishing, and the language is military : doesn’t this remind you of something known as “Cointelpro” ?
Back to what followed. Three weeks of hell were about to unfold.
The perps moved fast. They flew in, and attempted to break-in to install a GPS tracker on the bloggers’ vehicle – to get location and movements 24/7. They did not succeed with the GPS. Instead, they used vehicles which began circling the neighborhood, and menacingly following the couple when they left their residence.
The perps had already spray-painted graffiti onto the couple’s property; now they mailed a funeral wreath, and a book on overcoming the grief from a spouse’s death. Live cockroaches, live spiders came in the mail. Hustler’s ‘barely legal’ porn – mailed to their neighbors – in the couple’s name. At least 53 questionable subscriptions and publications were subscribed to, in the couples name, including cadaver lists. This created all manner of compromising ‘connections’ to the couple. A bloody mask from the Saw movies arrived, and in that movie, that was the last thing people ‘saw’ before being abducted, tortured, and murdered.
The effects were immediate. The couple began losing sleep from the constant harassment. At 4:30 one morning, for example, a person showed up at their doorstep – a 24 hour eatery, delivering food they had not ordered.
The perps unleashed a barrage of hideous emails and social media posts:
Fake accounts threatened to and and actually published the Couple’s home address on Twitter.
The perps would communicate their desire : stop the reporting on eBay, but then they pretended to be volatile eBay sellers concerned about their profits – not connected to eBay itself.
Fake craiglist ads popped up, soliciting sexual activity at the couple’s home for all night swinger’s parties. Or more subtle requests for bdsm, and publishing their home address. Here is just one example:
Meanwhile, co-conspirators kept an eye on local police – At one point, their look-outs called the perps off, just as police were being dispatched.
The perps gloated,
“…We know the targets have been impacted by this op.”
The perps made a more complex move: They falsely accused the couple of threatening eBay executives. This got written up in a fake corporate report. This would make the couple into POIs – Persons of Interest – potentially dangerous people that have to be watched. Police and associated safety organizations will normally watch POIs, sometimes intrusively.
NIMBY types will flock to watch POIs thinking they are saving their children from some potential threat. The perps were going to use the fake POI report to justify their corporate security department’s presence around the couple. They are ensuring safety, after all. The couple’s dossier was also built to make the couple look crazy. The perps were going to share that with the local PD. Everywhere they went, someone would be watching them.
The disturbing thing about the POI rstrategy is that the victimizer was falsely accusing the victims of being the aggressors. How’s that for security.
This, and more, all happening within just three weeks. The couple was absolutely terrorized. They froze their accounts, fearing identify theft and bank fraud. They slept in separate bedrooms – in case the stalkers decided to make good on their un-subtle death threats.
But, they also made a choice. Instead of running, or going silent, they decided to catch these guys. They got security cameras for their home, and dash cameras for ther car, and they started watching. The couple also decided to take pictures of the vehicles following them.
Finally, their efforts began showing results. Vehicles were recorded, circling the neighborhood and even stopping in front of the couple’s residence, for no reason. People were caught on camera, needlessly approaching the couple’s residence.
Then, a breakthrough: The couple got a picture of one of the vehicles that had been following them, including the license plate. The local police was informed, and looked into it. Unfortunately, the car was a rental. But… the plates traced the rental back, to a person, and the person had a LinkedIn profile: Bingo, an eBay employee. These journalists were critical of Ebay so maybe not a Coincidence. A local police investigation began.
The perps had been comfortably staying at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Boston, about 20 miles away from where the couple lived. Then this happened:
Things were getting tight. The perps knew they had been photographed in the car, so they had returned the rental. But they returned the rental at the Ritz Carlton, which led a detective to the hotel. And one of their hotel rooms was booked by the same employee who rented the car. There was some scurrying while perps decided how to be smart.
Then, as the police inquiries began, the perps’s scurrying had included trying to talk their way out of it. They tried to cover their tracks with each other, make up stories, delete their messages, and clean out their computers. Ebay’s security chief called the local police and got the local police to tell him all the information they had.
“Initially the PD was disregarding the reports as Paranoia. But when they gave the an accurate license plate number the detectives tracked it back…”
There it was, the single snapshot, a simple picture that brought them down.
The security chief was then hard-pressed into a two-track strategy:
“We just need to explain away [Perp’s] activities. Adamantly deny any deliveries and put focus on the POIs.”
One track was to give the fake POI report to the police. The couple was listed there as eBay’s top two POIs. This would destroy the victims’ credibility and justify the perps presence: the perps were the good guys, investigating a potential threat – it was the POIs who had caused it all.
Security could take one of the fake twitter accounts and create a fake paper trail: that person would suddenly become real, and be in the couple’s neighborhood: he must be the one terrorizing the couple. Those crazy POIs you know…. Another version of this plan was to simply search for a real POI, and then frame them for what was happening. The POIs, whether fake or real would also happen to be from Santa Clara: The town where someone had bought gift cards that were used to purchase some of items sent to the couple.
The Santa Clara gift cards were a thorn in the perp’s side. There was also store video of the same person who rented the car buying the gift cards, not far from eBay’s HQ in Santa Clara – that would link it all back to eBay. The perps decided to pull strings on someone in Santa Clara law enforcement: someone to mislead the local PD if they searched for the video.
These guys could do that, they could pull ‘rank’ on local police. After all, these perps were very high level security personnel, had clearances, held high rank in notable police departments. Positions the local cops might aspire to hold. The big lie tied things together, and the perps were the good guys “investigating” the whole thing. Any prior contact with the couple would be explained to the police as a “welfare check” on the couple – a loosely regulated and easily abused type of inquiry, one that could be blamed on the victims, and faked as part of the investigation.
The other track was a “white Knight” strategy – directed towards the couple. A perp was to approach the couple, again, out of concern. He had seen some threats, and being eBay’s security, he wanted to help. He would offer to work with the couple, in resolving the obvious threat posed by the perps. That strategy ran smack into the perceptive wife of the couple : she bought none of it, and harshly directed him to the local police.
Things weren’t going well. eBay’s security chief wrote his executive, apparently the CEO or senior VP, and asked for someone to run interference.
As of this time, there is no record of any reply.
Then, it lit. Federal Arrest warrants, Federal Charges.
The perps earned 18 USC 2261A charges due crossing state lines in their stalking/harassment – including renting vehicles, following them, spray painting their home, and the attempted break-ins. They got other federal charges, due to the cyberstalking: using the internet for their plan. All that took it into Federal jurisdiction.
The seemingly clever lying, conniving, and destruction of evidence earned them separate offences:
Witness tampering, destruction of evidence / obstructing a Federal investigation.
There was a multi-count indictment waiting for eBay’s Senior Director of Safety & Security – their head security guy. A five year sentence, three years of supervised release. A fine of up to $250,000.00 and mandatory restitution. For Each Charge.
In the same post with the Affidavit we have placed the criminal Judgment/Sentence that recently issued, so you can see how the couple’s stand made a difference. The criminal judgment shown is for a minor co-conspirator who pled guilty and received 18 months in Federal prison. Due to pleading guilty he got conspiracy to commit cyberstalking, and conspiracy to tamper with a witness. Three years of supervised release, and a $15,000.00 fine. All because of a courageous couple, and a timely snapped picture. That perp will not be running any stalking ops any time soon, will they ?
Maybe the guys at the top didn’t have anything on the couple. Maybe the easy money wasn’t worth it. Maybe those people they tortured were innocent.
Maybe the POIs don’t deserve what they are getting – harassment is punishment without a trial – it’s illegal. One indicator of how serious this corporate intelligence abuse of power is, came from the security chief’s own messages, intercepted during the investigation.
It turns out the security was annoyed by a small town DA, in his home town, who was prosecuting his father. The security chief asked for a report on the DA, including his kids names. He arrogantly gloated,
“This is a very small town. If I gave him an ounce of what we’ve been giving the [Victims], it would be devastating to him.”
Maybe it’s not right for private “intelligence” to be destroying small town DAs with such ease. And now, they’ll have a lot of time in federal pen to think about it.
In the end, the couple could have just stopped covering eBay, or moved. But they did not. Their courage, your courage, makes all the difference.
The people in this report are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Read “Corporate Targeting Exposed: Explore the Federal Criminal Charges Against eBay Executives for Gangstalking and Harassment” An Attorney’s Perspective on how to set back Harassment and Stalking #Gangstalking #harassment
Stalking by multiple perpetrators, accross state boundaries, resulting in fear. That’s it, the basic elements of a 2261A federal criminal court case.
How can you prove it ? That’s a Prosecutor’s job. But first, you have to give them what they need. Thorough investigation. Assembling your evidence. Then, a convincing presentation to the factfinder: The police.
In this criminal case seeking a warrant, this all started with an affidavit to the judge.
This Affidavit was used in Court to get criminal charges for the famous Ebay Gangstaking case. That case had a couple who ran a news blog one side; and several Ebay senior executives wielding their “security” department.
What is most important to note is how careful the writer is to include only things that are personally known, and often taking the time to explain how they are known. Effective criminal affidavits are about personal knowledge and well grounded belief. These things can be proven. Meanwhile matters of opinion and conjecture are avoided altogether – unless you have an expert that will testify. There is some explanation of the differences between personal knowledge, opinion and belief, in this post, and some practical pointers in this resource.
The Affidavit also illustrates the type of pattern evidence that is necessary for these stalking cases, and how it is documented. Though usually no physical injuries are required, stalking does generally require the infliction of fear. Here you will see a confluence of facts that would lead to fear:
An angry eBay Seller threatens to destroy a person; the eBay seller publishes that person’s home address online; the eBay seller sends a funeral wreath and a book on death; the eBay seller tweets about an imminent”visit” by the angry eBay sellers to the persons home; graffiti is left on the person’s home; and the person notices they are being followed around their home town. Any one of these facts by themselves does not paint a full picture of what transpired, and it requires substantial effort to document and present the full story.
We are making the Affidavit available for downloaded below:
Perpetrators of High-Tech Harassment and Revenge often look for secrecy. Their goal is a takedown or getting even, all without a trace.
One of the tools used in such harassment is V2K devices. Unfortunately, most people are simply uniformed about this technology:
V2K technology is not new. As shown in the attached support letter it was acknowledged in the leading Psychology Journal, as early as 1975. It was also acknowledged as a weapon, and listed in the U.S. Army Web Site. Most recently, it has seen commercial use, including use as a marketing tool – aimed at pedestrians on a New York sidewalk, to draw their attention to a movie billboard overhead.
Problems arise when a survivor of such a technology mentions them to authorities or family. They may automatically assume auditory hallucination and related mental ailments – pressing for involuntary commitments, or other unnecessary services.
What we have done here, for example, is to communicate with survivors and people in authority. We inform them of the technology and how it is used. This tends to defuse the situation and informs the parties of the possibilities. It is also good to show the person has backup. In the end, it is critical to point out how some of these situations are not indicative of mental illness, but may be related to harassment instead.
This guide is used to prepare your evidence and prove your case. Evidence rules prevent unfair convictions and judgments, but they require some leg work. You can use this to help prove your case, or to help show the other side has failed to prove theirs !
The guide was prepared by Texas Young Lawyers Association. We have no affiliation with TYLA, but we can say this work of theirs helps young lawyers lead worthwhile careers, and aids the public as well.
Guides of this type are an invaluable tool for litigation. We used tools like this to help prepare a case in a recent gangstalking matter described in its First part here, the Second part here, and the Third part here.
We are making the Guide available for downloaded below:
The state of things in this recent case saw years of abuse, culminating in a ploy to take a person’s home away from them. Terrorized with guns, blows, insults, all ending in the perps taking the house, too. In addition, two small children, now feared their lives would be upended. Again. This is the third part of this story (the 1st Part is here and the 2nd Part is here).
We joined this battle literally on the eve of trial. Reams of desperate pleadings, page long paragraphs, all-caps text, all pouring into our files.
How does one person and their attorney get out of this bind ? Long story short, we both put in what was needed.
First, you hear the story. You delve into the paperwork. Ask questions. Pore over each piece of evidence, acknowledge weaknesses. Follow up. Hear it again. Repeat. You are looking for any angle. There are things the client has not thought of, and vice-versa. Some things won’t fly, but you won’t know until you ask.
Here the proof gave us a definite picture to proceed upon. Only then can you really explore theories of defense and recovery in any detail. Discovery Requests can tell you what the other side has, so we sent these out. It’s one thing for a litigant to say something, quite another to have their theory put under the microscope.
Meanwhile investigation and review yielded valuable download links to certain documents – secured before the links stopped working just a few days later. This paperwork helped debunk their two false claims, meaning duress and forgery: these were aimed at home ownership. But that is only half the task. Once their claims cleared, we again looked to our client’s claims. There we can’t dis-assemble, we have to build, we have to prove that theory to the court. You need your building blocks, for whatever your theory of recovery happens to be. These informational building blocks are called your proof, your evidence.
And evidence is where lots of cases fail. When it comes to court, you are better off sticking to what you can prove, rather than going on hunches or naked beliefs.
How does one know what is provable ?
The simple answer is that our courts admit only evidence, and reject all else.
If it is not in proper evidence form, the decision-making process won’t see it. No matter how voluminous.
By way of example. say you need to prove Joe entered the bank at three. Five people testify at trial, they are sure he was there. “He was there.” But the guard who saw him, and the one who told all the other witnesses, didn’t testify. The fact you need is unproven.
The witnesses are merely hearing something and then saying something – prompting the old “hearsay” objection. They can’t prove Joe entered the bank, all they really know is the guard said so. They saw his jacket, his car, or saw him in the morning. He must have been there becase he counted his drawer at the end of the day. The best witness merely heard he was there from a guard who saw him. Not proven. He could have been out on break.
In this scenario, one of the biggest obstacles is the hearsay objection. Something said out of court, by someone who isn’t available to be cross-examined at trial. That prompts a hearsay objection.
How to overcome this obstacle ? Let’s say luck is with you and the guard who saw him arrives, testifying the last day of trial. Then he is asked the critical question, How does he know the time Joe entered ? Well, he asked the time of a teller, who didn’t testify! Fact remains unproven. That’s just what someone else said, and you can’t prove the truth of an out of court statement by someone who can’t be cross-examined.
Let’s think of another possibility: a note is written by the teller who faxes it at the last minute into the court, saying: I saw Joe enter the bank at 3:00pm that day.
Can letters and notes prove anything on their own ? Can pictures really speak for themselves ? Not in this scenario they can’t. You see courts are old fashioned, they work off witnesses. Papers and pictures can’t put up their hand to get sworn in. More seriously, the writing on the paper is just a written statement made out of court, by someone who isn’t available to be cross examined at trial. Objection stands. The factfinder, be it a judge or jury, will not see it.
Even if the teller had faxed a video screencap of Joe entering at 3:00pm, it will not overcome the problem.
The way around that hurdle is you get the person who is responsible for those records at the bank – called the custodian of records. This would be someone like the person who is responsible for their video system. They can raise their hand and testify about the picture’s origin and reliability. That process is called Authentication, and you need it for all records, pictures, and the like. You almost always need people, a witness, to vouch for the genuineness of any paperwork, pictures, or video. Otherwise it could have been a ruse by any kid with a photo editing app. Or a picture from the day before, because the date stamp is screwed up. And by the way, here make sure to get the video guy, plus the guy who made the screencap of the video, and the guy who faxed it, and the guy who received it at the court – since it could have been swapped at any of those times. Or, a skilled lawyer will object to the double, triple hearsay, and you’d be taking a chance your evidence won’t be seen.
Just because someone says it, or because it’s printed on paper or showing on a screen doesn’t make it true. Not asking these questions risks proof not being admitted – and all the effort being for naught. Laying a foundation is critical for documents and even a witneses’ knowledge. What something is. Who created it. Where has it been. How is something known. Otherwise how can you cross examine on the contents, or who may have changed it ? How would it be considered proof ? Here is a very good guide to laying foundation, from Texas, where the process is referred to as “predicate questions.” Think about these before you get to trial, so you can have everything lined up. That is partly how you overcome legal hurdles, and prove your case.
So the process of gathering proof is laborious and somewhat complex – that is what we we were in the middle of, for this case.
In this case we used process servers to serve Subpoenas: this uses the Court’s power to compel evidence. Once received, a subpoena compels you to appear or produce documents. In this case it secured witnesses and records, in the proper form needed to prove our claims.
Another quirk came up in this case: The percipient witness limitation.
What is that ? Well almost all witnesses are limited in their testimony, to what they saw, heard, smelled – something they perceived with their senses. That testimony usually starts with “I saw, I heard, I felt.” Notice there is no “I read” in that group: reading is not strictly perceiving anything, instead, you are mostly learning of someone else’s perceptions and opinions.
Contrast Percipient witnesses with Expert witnesses. Expert witnesses usually start with “I think,’ ‘I conclude,’ ‘I deduce.’ That’s about opinion; such as, “this radiation caused that injury.” Now. except for some basic fields of common experience (i.e. how fast was he going ?) Expert testimony can only be given by experts trained and admitted by the court, in their field of expertise, and opined in the present case.
Applying these expert versus percipient witness rules we see that a lone article by even the most reputable expert is not proof on a present case, no matter how close it matches the fact of your case. The article can’t stand to take the oath. And as you now know, such an article is also expressed outside of the court by someone who can’t be cross examined. So it is written hearsay at any rate.
So you sometimes need expert witnesses. The percipient versus expert witness rules are a common obstacle that stops people in their tracks at court. They are complicated and have exceptions, but they reduce speculation, allow confrontation, and foster cross-examination of witnesses and contrary evidence. Otherwise, a few rumors and a little photo editing would easily carry the day.
So in this case we took advantage of opinion/expert testimony. We onboarded a skilled expert – on a “Moore Marsden analysis” – to prove ownership of pre-owned property in marital cases.
At the end of several weeks we had stacks of evidence. There were three lawyers, and one forensic expert lined up to appear at trial. The case was ready for us to take a swing at it. This usually takes many months and even years.
The other side had seen what was coming: They had since lawyered up, intensely.
By the very next Court hearing we had obtained everything we needed: we could disprove the outrageous claims, show the Client’s side of the story, and return things to an even keel.
It was a fine morning last April, and everyone answered ready. This hearing would set the agenda for the coming trial, and present an opportunity to test the issues.
After years of suffering, a person’s home, in the balance.
Hours upon Hours of skilled back and forth ensued. Claims, sometimes outrageous claims were made. The client kept positive, cool, attentive: focused on working with the process and delivering the proof needed. There was palpable relief at not having to answer every artifice by themselves.
Lunch came and went, we never stopped. New strategies were tried, and answered. Arguments even accusations ensued. As the day drew to a close, there was definitely a moment, a turning point. As if a cloud had lifted, the case was finally seen for what it was.
The house was secured.
For those who suffered for years and who, along with their children, faced an uncertain living space: That last line bears repeating.
The house was secured.
The preparation was obvious, a good settlement was offered, and the years-old case settled right there and then, for fair terms.
Order Confirming Resolution
We were grateful when that extraordinary sense of closure filled that space, a well deserved recovery from years of suffering.
All cases are different, and credit where credit is due: all this was made plausible by the client. It was the client who gave us what we needed and persisted to the last.
We are delighted to produce knowledge people can use. No it’s not legal advice, as a lawyer in your jurisdiction would need all the details of your case to provide that. But this is a start in understanding what courts run on: Witnesses and evidence. Your sharing this work tells us the work is needed, so we can produce more. It keeps us motivated to dive into our mailbox for new cases to take on. We also remember people who support us. It really makes a difference in keeping us going. Fact is, if this post is retweeted or shared a total of 30 times, we’ll start work on a new one. Thanks!
Available: “Watch out for Gangstalkers’ III. A Plaintiff and their Attorney Overcoming a Gangstalker’s ploy. #Gangstalking #Harassment Tweet
Or share the link manually via email or facebook :
How else can you help in this battle ? Drop us a fiver and a nice comment here ! No amount is too small and you can even schedule a small monthly donation as well. Thank You.
After the Gangstalking threat, it is no coincidence: the person’s life became much more difficult.
How difficult ?
Here is an example of what gangstalkers do:
Unknown young men brazenly screaming at, assaulting, and striking at the person, for no apparent reason. Through the open window of a car – while the car was moving. Then, the strangers aggressively chasing the person through the parking lot of a supermarket, in broad daylight. All the while, there were children in the car.
The brazen criminals would then yell the person’s name,
‘Hey [name of victim ] We got your phone number!! From [your spouse]!!!’
A person might accept this abuse, endlessly wonder how they were responsible for upsetting these criminals, or even reduce their activity. They might just sink further into helpelessness and fear. And for most, choosing fear can lead to an endless way down.
But this person had enough. Instead of accepting the abuse, the would-be victim started to take a stand.
The spouses had separated. A divorce case was filed. Support groups were located, and the issues talked about. Video was taken of the brazen assaults, which heightened their credibility. The Legal Coop was contacted.
Saying no to fear and dependency, this was the start of something that can change life for the better.
With the abuser now out of the house and no longer in constant proximity, the battle moved to a different level: Lies to authority.
Now out of the house, the abuser had begun playing the victim. False reports: of duress, abuse. Even forgery of notarized documents was alleged.
Reading the papers one could recognize a pattern, an objective, a potential result : this could lead to topping everything off by taking the person’s home.
This has to do with a feature of some spousal cases: an implicit “fiduciary duty” between spouses.
What does this mean ? Well in some spousal cases these accusations can be used to shift property, including houses, from one spouse to another – to balance things out, a sort of punishment.
However, sometimes people can use this feature to take property from someone else. Apparent vulnerabilities, played to the hilt.
The way this was headed an abuser would be taking their victim’s property away from them. They had already filed the paperwork to achieve this in court. It looked bad.
Back to the email, to February 2021, and the decision: a trial just a few hours away.
The next dawn we swept survival gear off the table, and prepared to appear for their trial calendar. The gear’s presence is itself an interesting side note. It was there due to a weather-related declarations of emergency, in the area we were staying in. The situation had gone on for about a week.
Given the situation the attorney that appearaed at calendar call was, perhaps, puzzingly rough-hewn. Then again, two states of emergency would do that.
Judges do not like surprises on the day of trial. But judges can also be extraordinarily perceptive. At that time we pointed to significant shortcomings in the other side’s paperwork – themselves preventing a meaningful trial. After some questioning the able Judge saw through it, and granted a needed continuance to the trial.
Now we had time, now the case would be heard on the merits. Now, the work began in earnest.
How can a person get out of this bind ?
What helps prove a case in Court ?
We were thrilled to see interest in the second part of this story. By sharing this work you also let us receive support, which makes all the difference to keep us going. Show some interest in continuing this story ! If this story can be tweeted 30 times, or shared in Facebook 30 times, that tells me people want to learn more, and we will produce the final installment. Thanks!
Read: “Watch Out for Gangstalkers.” II – The Continuation of an Attorney’s Perspective on one case, and how to set back Harassment and Stalking #Gangstalking #Harassment
Enduring stalking and harassment- that’s bad enough – but what if it’s inside your own home ?
We were reminded of such hardship through an email, on a late night in February ’21.
It was a harrowing tale: Years of abuse, serial griefing. The real twist : the abuser was their spouse. Little kids, right in the middle of everything.
If that wasn’t bad enough, there was a pending grand finale: the abuser was trying to take away their home.
Looking through the story one could see a loss of respect. The abusive spouse had started belittling, insulting, and otherwise mistreating the other. Substance abuse became an issue. When insults weren’t enough, blows ensued.
Then, extra marital affairs.
The power trip was so intense, so overbearing that just mentioning the escalating infidelity brought upon a terrifying scenario:
The abuser grabbed a firearm, and proceeded to point the barrel at the other spouse’s face – threatening homicide. The would-be victim attempted retreat, yet the abuser responded by bringing the gun’s barrel under their chin: Now also threatening a suicide, or, a murder & suicide. Their children were right there, watching in horror.
That dispute prompted police involvement, which documented the scene:
Police Report
The home was a battlegound.
On a different day the abuser was caught in the act of extramarital sex, in the couples residence. While the other spouse was there. How did the perp get in ? The security system had been disabled, from the inside.
When confronted, the abuser returned a chilling, ominous threat:
‘Yeah I did that. Watch out for Gangstalkers.’
Was that a threat ? Are gangstalkers a real ? Can people get out of a situations like this ?
Yes, yes, and yes. We will show you what happened here. First show some interest in this subject. Make 20 tweets of the below tweet to show support for this work. This shows people want to know more about this case. Tweet now for more:
Read “Watch out for Gangstalkers’ An Attorney’s Perspective on one case and how to set back Harassment and Stalking #Gangstalking #harassment
We are helping more and more people this year! Want to give us a high five ? You can do it right here. You can also define a contributon you are comfortable with, here. Thanks!
The Legal Coop 